Download Śabdapramāṇa: Word and Knowledge: A Doctrine in by Puruṣottama Bilimoria (auth.) PDF

By Puruṣottama Bilimoria (auth.)

Show description

Read Online or Download Śabdapramāṇa: Word and Knowledge: A Doctrine in Mīmāṃsā-Nyāya Philosophy (with reference to Advaita Vedānta-paribhāṣā ‘Agama’) Towards a Framework for à ruti-prāmāṇya PDF

Best philosophy books

Reasons and Persons (Oxford Paperbacks)

Hard, with numerous strong arguments, a few of our inner most ideals approximately rationality, morality, and private identification, Parfit claims that we have got a fake view approximately our personal nature. it is usually rational to behave opposed to our personal most sensible interersts, he argues, and such a lot people have ethical perspectives which are self-defeating.

Under the Net

Iris Murdoch's first novel is determined in part of London the place suffering writers rub shoulders with profitable bookles, and picture stariets with frantic philosophers. Its hero, Jake Donaghue, is a drifting, smart, likeable younger guy, who makes a residing out of translation paintings and sponging off his pals.

Essays in the Metaphysics of Mind

Jaegwon Kim provides a range of his essays from the final 20 years. the quantity comprises 3 new essays, on an agent-centered first-person account of motion rationalization, the thoughts of attention and their bearings at the mind-body challenge, and the nonexistence of legislation within the exact sciences.

The Ontology of Socratic Questioning in Plato's Early Dialogues (SUNY Series in Ancient Greek Philosophy)

A provocative shut examining revealing a thorough, proto-phenomenological Socrates.

Modern interpreters of Plato’s Socrates have often taken the dialogues to be geared toward understanding goal fact. Attending heavily to the texts of the early dialogues and the query of advantage particularly, Sean D. Kirkland means that this method is flawed—that such situation with gaining knowledge of exterior evidence rests on glossy assumptions that might were faraway from the minds of Socrates and his contemporaries. This isn’t, besides the fact that, to accuse Socrates of any type of relativism. via cautious research of the unique Greek and of various competing strands of Plato scholarship, Kirkland in its place brings to gentle an intensive, proto-phenomenological Socrates, for whom “what advantage is” is what has continually already seemed as virtuous in daily event of the area, no matter if preliminary appearances are unsatisfactory or vague and wanting higher scrutiny and explanation.

Additional info for Śabdapramāṇa: Word and Knowledge: A Doctrine in Mīmāṃsā-Nyāya Philosophy (with reference to Advaita Vedānta-paribhāṣā ‘Agama’) Towards a Framework for à ruti-prāmāṇya

Example text

Interesting as Bhartrhari's theory is, we want to be able to avoid some of the metaphysical assumptions that are germain to his system - for instance, that there is an ontological identity between language, at its most subtle level, and reality, in its penultimate nature. Nor do we want to assume that the problem of the relation between knowledge and reality is reducible to the problem of the relation between knowledge and meaning and between language and reality. But, as in any analysis, I do make some INTRODUCTION 19 assumptions which I cannot hope to justify here, and which are to be disavowed as soon as their elucidatory purpose has been served.

The first concerns his emphasis on the principal role of the sentence (vakya). According to Bhartrhari, what is permanent is the relation that sentence bears to its meaning. a'. If 'sentence' is the minimal meaningful speech-element, then there cannot be anything less than the sentence which could also be said to be a meaningful unit. a is sometimes taken to be discrete units of meaning, such as a word, a letter,or a particle, through which 'meaning', as it were, 'bursts forth'. D. 22 The reference, then, is not to any meaning-bearing element as such, unless the association is with a sentence.

Language, too, cannot be said to represent or embody these truths in their totality, as language deals with concepts and the truths are not necessarily conceptual, though they may come close to the conceptual structures, say, of certain cognitive understandings. Language may, however, succeed in pointing to these truths. Thus, it may be said, truths of the higher order outrun, as it were, language and grasping by person or persons. ruti thus assumes itself to be one with these truths, being able to embody some and point to others.

Download PDF sample

Rated 4.55 of 5 – based on 49 votes